How much of this actually runs?

The pipeline that produced the published passport runs end to end: ingestion, deterministic extraction, confidence scoring, human attestation where confidence is low, and issuance of a signed credential. The passport on this site is that pipeline's output, not a mockup of it.

Human review sounds expensive. Does it scale?

Review is confidence-driven, not blanket: most attributes verify deterministically and never need a human. A registered attester steps in only where confidence is low, reviews at attribute level, and every review is recorded on the audit trail. Human judgment is spent where it changes the outcome, not on reading everything twice.

What if the documents were never organised?

That is the normal starting point, and it is the one the demonstration starts from. Documents arrive as they exist, are sorted into evidence classes, and what is missing per attribute is shown rather than assumed. Organising the backlog is the first thing the pipeline does, not a precondition for running it.

Back to AnyDPP Host

Verified evidence

Deterministic first. Extraction from structured, signed documents is deterministic; AI models never decide facts. Every attribute carries its source document and a confidence level on a hash-chained audit trail. An unresolved low-confidence attribute holds issuance of the whole passport: a registered human attester resolves it first. AI for scale, humans for the final word.

What the confidence levels mean

HIGH: structured, signed or officially issued evidence, verified and consistent across sources, or lifted by a registered human attestation.
MEDIUM: valid documentary evidence with limited verification depth; flagged and published, awaiting stronger corroboration.
LOW: insufficient, contradictory or unverifiable information; holds issuance of the whole passport until a registered human attester resolves it.

See the confidence rail illustrated, with more detail, on our homepage. See more on the homepage

The EUDR evidence map for importers

Article 9(1) of the EU Deforestation Regulation lists eight information requirements, points (a) to (h), that an operator must collect and keep for every shipment. Every row becomes an attribute on the passport: source document linked, confidence scored, human review where required. The last row is not an Article 9(1) item and is marked as such.

Source: Regulation (EU) 2023/1115, Article 9(1), points (a) to (h); point (b) as replaced by Regulation (EU) 2025/2650, Article 1, point (8)(a); Article 4(2) and Article 33 for the due diligence statement (primary source) · checked on 23 August 2026

The EUDR evidence map for importers
Evidence	Article	What the operator must be able to show	Typical source
Product and commodity description	Art. 9(1)(a)	Trade name and type, the commodities contained or used, and for wood the species names	Commercial documents
Quantity	Art. 9(1)(b)	Net mass in kilograms for products entering or leaving the market, with the supplementary unit where one applies	Invoice and customs documents
Country of production	Art. 9(1)(c)	Origin, and the relevant parts of the country where that matters	Commercial and customs documents
Geolocation of production plots	Art. 9(1)(d)	All plots of land, or all establishments where cattle were kept	Producer land records and registries
Production period	Art. 9(1)(d)	The date or time range of production	Producer and lot records
Supplier and recipient identity	Art. 9(1)(e), (f)	Name, postal address and email of who supplied the products and of who they were supplied to	Invoices and contracts
Deforestation-free evidence	Art. 9(1)(g)	Adequately conclusive and verifiable information that the products are deforestation-free, against the 31 December 2020 cut-off	Land records, geospatial evidence, attestation
Legality	Art. 9(1)(h)	Adequately conclusive and verifiable information that production followed the producer country's relevant legislation	Official records
Due diligence statement reference	Art. 4(2) and Art. 33, not Art. 9(1)	The DDS (Due Diligence Statement) submitted in the EU Information System (TRACES (Trade Control and Expert System (the EU's import-notification platform))). This is not an Article 9(1) information requirement: it rests on Article 4(2) and Article 33.	The operator's own filing

The EUDR clock

EUDR (EU Deforestation Regulation) applies from 30 December 2026 for medium and large operators, and for micro and small enterprises already covered by the EU Timber Regulation. Remaining micro and small enterprises follow on 30 June 2027. Prepare your evidence chain before the deadline, not after it.

EUDR overview

The evidence importers must hold: what to check and where to improve.

See the EUDR overview

Frequently asked questions

How much of this actually runs?: The pipeline that produced the published passport runs end to end: ingestion, deterministic extraction, confidence scoring, human attestation where confidence is low, and issuance of a signed credential. The passport on this site is that pipeline's output, not a mockup of it.
Human review sounds expensive. Does it scale?: Review is confidence-driven, not blanket: most attributes verify deterministically and never need a human. A registered attester steps in only where confidence is low, reviews at attribute level, and every review is recorded on the audit trail. Human judgment is spent where it changes the outcome, not on reading everything twice.
What if the documents were never organised?: That is the normal starting point, and it is the one the demonstration starts from. Documents arrive as they exist, are sorted into evidence classes, and what is missing per attribute is shown rather than assumed. Organising the backlog is the first thing the pipeline does, not a precondition for running it.

Back to AnyDPP Host