First concrete application of the AnyLAI architecture

The Brazil-EU evidence corridorCompliance is becoming the common language of multipolar trade.

AnyLAI turns Brazilian export documents (NF-e, CAR, MAPA) into verified EUDR evidence and Digital Product Passports built on UNTP and W3C Verifiable Credentials.

See the demo passport and verify it yourself Get in touch

Which of the two are you?

I import into the EU I export from Brazil

In one sentence: AnyLAI turns scattered export paperwork into a signed passport whose signature and sources a buyer or inspector can check, before either has to ask for it.

Signed
Checkable without AnyLAI's database
Hash-chained audit trail
AI-assisted, human-verified
Hosted in the EU

The problem

The deadline is not moving.

In simple terms: starting soon, a shipment without solid paperwork can run into trouble with a European buyer or authority, so it pays to have that evidence ready ahead of time.

The EU Deforestation Regulation applies to large and medium operators from 30 December 2026. The competent authorities' check duties apply from that same date, not earlier; what has been in place since the Regulation entered into force is the Member States' duty to designate those authorities and to set penalties.

By the time large-scale enforcement begins, the evidence chain needs to already exist, not be built after the fact.

Source: Regulation (EU) 2023/1115, Article 38(1) and (2) (Articles 14 and 25 are outside the deferred list), as replaced by Regulation (EU) 2025/2650 (primary source) · checked on 6 September 2026

Source: Regulation (EU) 2023/1115, Article 38(2) and (3), as replaced by Regulation (EU) 2025/2650, Article 1, point (25) (primary source) · checked on 6 September 2026

The problem

Why now

The EU Deforestation Regulation entered into force in June 2023. Its application date has since moved twice: from December 2024 to December 2025, then split into 30 December 2026 for large and medium operators and 30 June 2027 for micro and small ones.

On 13 July 2026, the European Commission adopted a delegated act that would update Annex I, adding soluble coffee and removing leather, together with an implementing act for the regulation's Information System. The delegated act is still under European Parliament and Council scrutiny and is not yet in force. That Information System had reopened at the end of June 2026.

Digital Product Passports sit inside a wider trajectory under the EU's Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation, still under construction. The battery passport, mandatory from 18 February 2027, is its first concrete case.

Every date above is a published regulatory milestone. Where a framework is still being built, this page calls it a trajectory, not a settled fact.

Source: Commission delegated act of 13 July 2026 amending Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2023/1115 (no OJ number yet), Regulation (EU) 2023/1115, Article 36(4) and (5) (scrutiny); Annex I (primary source) · checked on 23 August 2026

How it works

What it does

In practice: documents go in, the system checks them, a qualified person reviews anything uncertain, and out comes a passport a European buyer can verify.

Ingest Brazilian export documents: NF-e (Brazilian electronic invoice) electronic invoices, CAR (Rural Environmental Registry (Brazil)) geo-polygons, MAPA (Brazilian Ministry of Agriculture) phytosanitary certificates.
Parse them deterministically against EUDR (EU Deforestation Regulation) rule-packs, default-deny.
Score the evidence for confidence, route what is uncertain to a registered human attester, and compose a Digital Product Passport: UNTP (UN Transparency Protocol), W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) Verifiable Credentials, GS1 (GS1, the global standards body for product identifiers) QR, plus a DDS (Due Diligence Statement) draft.

Zooming out, here is where AnyLAI and AnyDPP sit inside the wider export-to-audit chain:

How it works

What this means for the business

When an inspector or a buyer's compliance team asks a question, the evidence already exists. It was assembled as documents arrived, not pulled together under pressure the week a shipment is due.

An inconsistency between a NF-e (Brazilian electronic invoice) invoice, a CAR (Rural Environmental Registry (Brazil)) polygon, or a MAPA (Brazilian Ministry of Agriculture) certificate surfaces before the shipment leaves Brazil, not after it reaches a European port. Catching it early is less rework than catching it at customs.

The evidence chain composed here is already shaped for the importer's own DDS (Due Diligence Statement), which reduces the back-and-forth a European buyer's compliance team would otherwise need to open with the exporter.

Every passport carries a cryptographic signature and a QR code. A buyer can check the signature without any access to AnyLAI's database: the verifier resolves the issuer's public identifier document and tests the signature against the key published there. Today that check follows the verification procedure AnyLAI documents; verification with standards-based third-party tools is being completed, and this page says so rather than claiming it early.

The cost of not having it ready

The same gap has a cost when the evidence is not ready before someone asks for it:

A shipment's paperwork can sit longer at a European port while a buyer's compliance team chases down what should already be attached.

Reconciling a NF-e invoice, a CAR polygon, and a MAPA certificate by hand after the fact takes more staff time than catching a mismatch as it happens.

Every missing answer becomes another email or call with the buyer's compliance team, on a timeline the exporter does not control.

An auditor's question lands harder when the evidence has to be assembled on the spot instead of simply opened.

None of this is a prediction about any specific shipment. It is the ordinary cost of assembling evidence after the fact instead of before.

This is not a mockup. Below is a real, signed passport carrying demonstration content, not a real shipment, together with its QR code. The credential and the signature are genuine; the coffee lot in it is demonstration data, and the passport page lists the known limitations of this demonstration issuance. Open it and check it yourself, against the credential rather than against anything said on this page.

See the demo passport and verify it yourself

For importers

The work that prevents a problem at the border happens before the cargo moves.

See what a shared passport puts in front of an importer

Corridor

The corridor

In simple terms: this starts with the coffee trade between Brazil and Germany, the busiest lane in this corridor today.

Brazil is the EU's largest coffee supplier, and Germany is its largest single buyer. AnyLAI starts where that trade is busiest: the evidence corridor between Brazilian origins and European roasters.

Brazil-EU trade also sits inside a wider shift. The EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement has applied provisionally since 1 May 2026. The wider Partnership Agreement, politically concluded in December 2024 and signed in January 2026, is a separate instrument: it is not in force and still needs ratification. It is the backdrop to this corridor, not a claim about the corridor's own legal status.

Source: Notice 2026/868 (OJ L, 15.4.2026); Council Decision (EU) 2026/183; Council Decision (EU) 2026/185, Interim Agreement on Trade, Article 23.3 (primary source) · checked on 23 August 2026

5.4M · 13.5%

Germany = #1 buyer of Brazilian coffee 2025 · 5.4M bags · 13.5% of Brazil's exports (Cecafé)

US$15.5–15.6B

Brazil 2025 coffee exports: record ≈US$15.5–15.6B (Cecafé)

34.2%

EU coffee imports 2025: 2.86M t · €18.7B · Brazil #1 supplier (34.2%)

Coffee is where this starts. The EUDR covers six more commodities, each with its own traceability profile.

See the EUDR landscape

Questions about how this applies to a specific shipment or corridor? Ask about the corridor